Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-h Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:aeq From: aeq@pucc-h (Sargent) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Highway driving Message-ID: <426@pucc-h> Date: Mon, 9-Jan-84 23:04:38 EST Article-I.D.: pucc-h.426 Posted: Mon Jan 9 23:04:38 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Jan-84 03:24:00 EST Organization: Purdue University Computing Center Lines: 57 It figures.... I come back from vacation and immediately post to net.flame. In past months we have seen considerable flaming about the low quality of drivers in various cities (notably Boston). Having logged 4000 highway miles in the last 3 weeks, it is time for me to say some similar deserved unkind words about drivers on the interstate system. There are several phenomena I observed for which I have varying degrees of detestation. <<< IGNITION >>> <<< WE HAVE A LIFT-OFF >>> 1. Drivers who run with their bright headlights on when they are close enough to other vehicles for the excess light to cause discomfort. Take note: The mere fact that you have a median between you and oncoming traffic does not (usually) make you invisible! And there is NO excuse, absolutely NONE, for having your bright headlights on when you are within several hundred meters of a car in front of you. Many's the time I've wished I had a pair of headlights (or floodlights) mounted facing backward on my car so I could kick them on if some bozo was following me with his brights on. 2. Drivers who park on your tail and follow you, at highway speeds, at a separation of about 1 car length when the highway is not crowded. Several times on my journeys, a vehicle caught up to me, then slowed to my speed (usually around a fairly conservative 60 mph) and stayed right behind me. I have a psychological trick I use to get such people off my tail: I slow down gradually. Eventually they usually give up and pass me. But I do not like to have to slow down my progress just to get rid of an inconsiderate driver. (It is especially inconsiderate for drivers to follow me thus at night, and UTTERLY inconsiderate when it is combined with #1 [brights].) 3. Those who drive pickups and vans (this is net.flame, so I can get away with saying this). Most drivers of such vehicles are the greatest speedsters on the roads. The remainder should attach red triangles to the back of their vehicles as a warning that they are slow-moving vehicles. Also, at night, the high-placed headlights of these vehicles are in a position to cause maximum discomfort to drivers of small cars (I have a VW Rabbit). And in addition, big vehicles are what are known (if a film in my driver's ed class told the truth) as "billboards", i.e. large, opaque objects which serve the purpose of blocking (perhaps dangerously, and certainly annoyingly) the view of other drivers. 4. Those states (e.g. Missouri) which post "Keep Right Except to Pass" signs. I like to travel in the left lane when traffic is light (e.g. 3 a.m.). It gives me a feeling of power and importance; also, the left lane is often in better condition than the right. Obviously the idea of the signs is to keep the left lane in good condition to save on road repair costs; but surely my little car won't hurt the left lane too badly (not like a 40-ton semi). I want my constitutional right to travel in whatever lane I like! 5. In defense of Missouri, let me say that it has good rest areas...except the one closed for remodeling!! That should be illegal. It's not nice to make drivers wait an extra hour for a rest area: a) they may be waiting for a nice, safe rest area to check something on their car; b) they (or in some cases, their kids) may not be able to "hold it" that extra hour. Surely the rest area could have been left open even with the remodeling. (Fortunately, I was able to make it to the next one without a burst bladder....) <<< LANDING >>> -- Jeff Sargent/...pur-ee!pucc-h:aeq