Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1e.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihu1e!howardh From: howardh@ihu1e.UUCP (Howard Hill) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Wombats Message-ID: <179@ihu1e.UUCP> Date: Fri, 13-Jan-84 12:06:50 EST Article-I.D.: ihu1e.179 Posted: Fri Jan 13 12:06:50 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Jan-84 03:38:42 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 42 The argument between Laura and Tim is very amusing because, you see, wombats do not exist. I shall demonstrate this by giving a proof by contradiction. (1) Assume wombats exist. If so, they must come in different colors, e.g. godless red commie wombats, and heathen yellow wombats. (2) However, I will now show that if wombats exist, they must be all the same color. I offer the following proof by induction: Base step: A set consisting of only wombat contains only wombats of one color. Induction step: Given a set of N+1 wombats. Remove one wombat from this set. The resulting singleton set contains only one wombat and obviously it contains only wombats of one color. The resulting set of size N (by hypothesis) contains only wombats of one color. Therefore the original set of size N+1 contains wombats of one color. Extremal step: If wombats were to exist, the set of all wombats would have to be a denumerable set. I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for this, however the margin of this screen is to small to contain it. (3) Therefore if wombats were to exist they would both have to be all the same color and not all the same color. Since this is a contradiction, the hypothesis that wombats exist is false. I hope this is up to the usual high standards of reasoning and logic I have seen in net.flame. -- . /|\ Another message sailing thru the net / | \ from / | \ Howard Hill / |___\ (312) 979-7212 *-----"------; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~