Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!whuxle!pyuxll!abnjh!u1100a!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.religion
Subject: Re: Can Creationists Contribute to Science?
Message-ID: <401@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Jan-84 20:58:18 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.401
Posted: Tue Jan  3 20:58:18 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Jan-84 04:20:26 EST
References: <1330@cbscc.UUCP> <3439@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Piscataway
Lines: 17


    	To restore science and all of scholarship to the condition of an
	open-ended search for knowledge and understanding. 

I thought that's exactly what science has been doing for some time now.

							The present
	condition of science leaves open only the ends toward non-God,
	impotent-God, or irrelevant-God.

So, rather than accepting the conclusions science offers us about god,
let's invent a new science that leaves open the notion of omnipotent god,
and then we can rewrite everything science has accomplished thus far, in
order to suit our pre-ordained conclusions.  So much for logic and
scientific method...
-- 
					Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr