Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!ihnp4!ihuxm!spear
From: spear@ihuxm.UUCP (Steven Spearman)
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.legal
Subject: Re: Legality of refusing to accept bills greater than $20
Message-ID: <791@ihuxm.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Jan-84 09:22:44 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxm.791
Posted: Mon Jan  9 09:22:44 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Jan-84 00:41:14 EST
References: <2361@rabbit.UUCP>, <3064@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 11

Heaven forbid that I should argue with a lawyer on a legal point,
but I wanted to point out that the state DOES have a vested 
interest in insuring total acceptance of its legal tender,
therefore some of the premises in Mr. Sherman's opinion may be
invalid.

He is right of course that the police would do nothing.  The
best approach is simply not to patronize such a place.

Steve Spearman
ihnp4!ihopb!spear