Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!jab
From: jab@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies.sw
Subject: Parsecs? Really, now... - (nf)
Message-ID: <4788@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Jan-84 04:53:06 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.4788
Posted: Fri Jan  6 04:53:06 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Jan-84 11:22:28 EST
Lines: 21

#N:uokvax:12300012:000:718
uokvax!jab    Jan  3 14:17:00 1984

Parsecs?

Now wait a minute. I suspect that all this talk about whether or not
George Lucas MEANT to use the term "parsec" incorrectly is a crock. He
was diving into MYTHOLOGY, not SCIENCE FICTION; I don't suspect that
he's losing sleep about this "minor" things.

If you're interested in talking about trivial parts of the SW movies (I have
some friends who insist that there are no "non-trivial" parts of the SW
movies), you might try to decipher the "baby talk" that the Jawas used in
Star Wars, or the fact that in only ONE PLACE in the trilogy is written
english used. (Where?)

Also, you bet your ass that ILM is using computer graphics a lot. (Wouldn't
you be suprised if they didn't?)

	Jeff Bowles
	Lisle, IL