Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site stolaf.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!stolaf!twiss From: twiss@stolaf.UUCP Newsgroups: net.music Subject: Re: They don't write them.... Message-ID: <1333@stolaf.UUCP> Date: Tue, 24-Jan-84 18:31:16 EST Article-I.D.: stolaf.1333 Posted: Tue Jan 24 18:31:16 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jan-84 09:31:44 EST References: <4860@umcp-cs.UUCP> Organization: St. Olaf College, Northfield MN Lines: 32 Tim Wicinski recently told Bill Gulley that he made a fool of himself and that everything he knew was wrong. Hmmmmm..... First of all, Bill was questioning why certain "good" bands did not make it on the "Top Ten" and why other bands alter their sounds inorder to make it. He also asks if this implies anything about the overall quality in pop music. To which Mr. Wicinski replies: he knows of a band (oops I forgot the name) that was great and that when they started to get popular, they broke up. Well now, if we both put on our thinking caps, Tim, we can see that your example merely underscores Bill's sentiments. I'm not familliar with the band in question so I'll take your word for it that it was indeed good. The fact that they got scared of conforming to certain pop standards should indicate to us thinking cap wearers that "good" musicians avoid pop music (implying, of course, that pop music is bad). Now I don't think that either Bill or I hate all pop music; far from it. But we do question a lot of pop music's precepts. Did you read Bill's article or did you just skim it and fly off the handle. Bill at least was trying to raise some questions for us all to think about, but Tim responds with insults and name-calling. Is this really necessary?? The philosophy of aesthetics is indeed a complex and highly subjective topic, but (if we are still wearing our thinking caps) we should at least be able to express ourselves rationally. Tom Twiss ..!ihnp4!stolaf!twiss