Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site druxt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!drutx!druxt!mcq
From: mcq@druxt.UUCP (McQueerRL)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Anarchy in (in)action, part 2: the consumers' newsgroup
Message-ID: <877@druxt.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 21-Jan-84 12:32:35 EST
Article-I.D.: druxt.877
Posted: Sat Jan 21 12:32:35 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 23-Jan-84 04:28:07 EST
References: <812@ut-sally.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 15

[]---

I agree.  Let me reiterate my position that the consumers newsgroup is
one of the few "new newsgroup" suggestions I've heard that I really agree
with.  For the proposed purpose, the newsgroup concept as handled today
should work well, unlike some other areas.

I believe I suggested "net.ripoff".  I was being facetious.  I'm sure a
name discussion would have evolved without my sticking my oar in, and
a certain amount of discussion to settle on a good name is needed, but
let's not lose sight of the fact that a fair number of people think the
newsgroup is a good idea.

			Bob McQueer
			ihnp4!druxt!mcq