Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!whuxle!pyuxll!abnjh!u1100a!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: merger of net.music/net.records
Message-ID: <417@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Jan-84 13:02:46 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.417
Posted: Mon Jan 23 13:02:46 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jan-84 06:48:37 EST
References: <2203@harpo.UUCP>
Organization: Central Services Org., Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 22

re: "I propose the following:  net.music.rock, net.music.jazz (for those
offended by "rock" in a music newsgroup), net.music.classical (for those
offended by "rock" and "jazz" in a music newsgroup), net.music.jazz.swing
(for those offended by the inclusion of electronic performers in a jazz
newsgroup), net.music.classical.serious (for those who want to discuss
serious music without being bothered by questions like "What's that, like,
ya know, classical piece at the start of the movie "Abbott & Costello Meet
the Swamp Thing"??)..."

NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!
Haven't we gone through this bullshit enough times in the past?  (Sorry to
flame at netnovices, but still...)

net.music:  For discussion of music.  Period.

If you don't see enough articles on classical/jazz/kazoo music/etc. in the
newsgroup, then submit some!!!!  Creating net.music.kazoo is not going to
cause a flurry of kazoo articles to appear where once there were none!!
The net is only as good as its contributors!
-- 
Pardon me for breathing...
	Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr