Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site houxm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!dis2
From: dis2@houxm.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Missing positives
Message-ID: <680@houxm.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Jan-84 13:37:44 EST
Article-I.D.: houxm.680
Posted: Thu Jan 19 13:37:44 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Jan-84 06:38:13 EST
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 27

In the style of Biil Brown:
 
Is it ept to cite "inept"?
  
Am I pudent to cite "impudent"?
   
Rather than keep it bosomed, I cite "umbosomed".
   
Do I merit a precation for citing "imprecation"?
   
It is certainly effable to cite "ineffable".
    
Is there a passe to cite "impasse"?
  
It is toward to cite "untoward"?
    
It is fathomable to cite "unfathomable"?
    
Am I regenerate if I cite "unregenerate"?
    
Is is ruly to cite "unruly"?
    
Is this tenth citation told by citing "untold"?
   
Do I feel consolate to cite "disconsolate"?
   
Is this list junct by lastly citing "disjunct"?