Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!tynor
From: tynor@uiucuxc.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Why not create net.origins - (nf)
Message-ID: <4832@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Jan-84 22:33:56 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.4832
Posted: Mon Jan  9 22:33:56 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Jan-84 03:29:21 EST
Lines: 23

#N:uiucuxc:19400009:000:815
uiucuxc!tynor    Jan  8 15:56:00 1984

Heck, why *not* start a new notesfile called net.origins ?  There seems to
be enough interest in the creation/evolution issue and net.physics
subscribers seem to be annoyed at people wishing to discuss it...
So why not create a separate notesfile ? 

What's wrong with the net.origins title anyway? "What's in a name?"
If creationists want to discuss evolution in such a notesfile,  why not
let them.  

Let's not get to concerned over whether we are giving up to much by
allowing such a title as net.origins.  For those concerned about giving
in to the creationists, however, take a look at a current effort to
"redefine" 'science'.  There's an outline of a current attempt in net.misc.
It's titled : "Can Creationists contribute to Science?"

               I love a good argument,
   
                  steve