Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site grkermit.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!chris From: chris@grkermit.UUCP (Chris Hibbert) Newsgroups: net.physics Subject: Re: this is the article on Hume Message-ID: <685@grkermit.UUCP> Date: Tue, 17-Jan-84 16:13:33 EST Article-I.D.: grkermit.685 Posted: Tue Jan 17 16:13:33 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 18-Jan-84 07:10:01 EST References: <1667@utcsstat.UUCP> Organization: GenRad Inc., Concord, MA Lines: 28 I'm going to nitpick since you (laura) say that you are trying to polish this argument. You said: "The memory stores sense impressions. So there are sense impressions and the memory of sense impressions. So what does one do? One posits an "I" that connects these memories together. This is called self- consciousness. Anything with a memory also has a self-conscious by this model. So where Descartes was able to say that animals cannot feel pain because they do not have a thinking mind, Hume cannot. Animals have a memory, therefore they have a self-conscious. (I actually think that it was Berkeley who went on about this, not Hume.)" Between "This is called self-consciousness." and "Anything with a memory also has a self-conscious by this model." you seem to have lost track of your statement that the "I" is what "connects these memories together." I would argue that having a memory isn't sufficient. The mind that operates on the memory must contain some concept of the importance of the connection between the memories. Merely being aware of the various parts isn't enough; there has to be a level of abstraction that says they are all part of some single thing. I can't speculate about what Descartes, Hume and Berkeley thought about animals being self-conscious, but I would say that some are and some aren't. The difference would have to depend on whether their actions and plans include themselves as a factor. For instance, a dog that can't figure out why its itchy tail keeps moving away as it is chased, doesn't seem to have a concept of itself as a discrete agent.