Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxq.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!ihuxq!partha From: partha@ihuxq.UUCP (Partha Raghavachari) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Western news media and the Third World Message-ID: <522@ihuxq.UUCP> Date: Sat, 21-Jan-84 13:20:50 EST Article-I.D.: ihuxq.522 Posted: Sat Jan 21 13:20:50 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 23-Jan-84 04:28:38 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 51 As a citizen of one of the so called "developing" countries I wish to share some thought about the way western news media report events in third world countries. After a considerable period of exposure to news reporting here I get the impression that the western press is less than objective when it comes to reporting events in these countries. In particular, I have seen and read more negative reports on TV and in print than positive about India ( if anything gets reported about India at all). It is amusing news here if a potential bride in India refuses to marry because of the fear that her husband would force her to carry water from far off place in India's desert province. I remember even my university student newspaper reporting this. Yet, when India launched a satellite on its own ( I am not talking about the one launched recently by the space shuttle ) it was largely ignored by the news media. Granted there are immense problems facing developing countries, but is it asking too much to get a balanced report? I get the impression that the western news media is too cynical. How many people here know that India has the third largest scientific base in the world and is among the ten largest industrial nations in the world? And the politicians don't seem to help either. Sometime back, while addressing a nuclear freeze group, Congressman Edward Markee (sp?) said something to the effect that a nuclear war in the future is not going to be started by the superpowers but by smaaller countries.As an example, he cited India dropping a nuclear bomb on Pakistan! I was more than upset by this remark, to put it mildly. If a country develops nuclear technology on its own much to the disliking of the superpowers does it automatically mean that the technology is going to be used to drop bombs on other countries and start a nuclear war? Why is Pakistan seen as a victim? Surely, India did not start any of the wars with Pakistan. And the political situation in Pakistan is anything but normal. Since 1947, there is yet to be a democratically elected government in Pakistan. I have heard many of my american friends tell me how their mothers used to remind them of starving children in India if they wasted food. I hope they would also tell them about the positive developments. One of my colleagues even wondered if life could be possible in India. I am willing to let it go as a joke. My question to the western audience is: How do you react to the news media reports on third world countries? a) Is the reporting adequate? b) Is it biased? c) couldn't care less.