Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxl.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!ihuxl!pvp From: pvp@ihuxl.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: The Joy of Starvation Message-ID: <854@ihuxl.UUCP> Date: Mon, 23-Jan-84 12:13:49 EST Article-I.D.: ihuxl.854 Posted: Mon Jan 23 12:13:49 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jan-84 05:30:08 EST Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 37 >It is not possible to end starvation by sending food to the hungry -- one >simply ends up with many more hungry people. This is no kindness. The >solution lies in helping the hungry people to self-sufficiency, by teaching >methods of birth control and improved agriculture. This the United States >does, and should do more of. > >Scott Renner >{ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!renner This has got to be the most asinine statement I've ever seen in net.politics. While millions of children die each year due to malnutrition world-wide, the warehouses of the United States bulge with excess food purchased from our farmers by our government to keep the prices high. And along comes Mr. Renner to pontificate that feeding the hungry does them no kindness! Yes, Mr. Renner, we know that simply sending food to the hungry does not make them self-sufficient. All it does is keep them alive, so that perhaps they may learn to be self-sufficient someday. But apparently you would prefer them to be self-sufficiently dead. Serves them right for not practicing birth-control, doesn't it? So just let those babies starve to death, it will teach them a lesson. And just keep warehousing all that milk and cheese, so that we keep the prices high. After all, if we gave it away to feed the dying babies in sub-saharan Africa, then they wouldn't have to buy it, and the prices would fall. Tsk, tsk, then how would they ever learn to be self-sufficient? I hope you don't profess to be a Christian, Mr. Renner. You are a disgrace to the human race. Phil Polli ihuxl!pvp