Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!andree
From: andree@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Who Made The Following Statements??? - (nf)
Message-ID: <5113@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Jan-84 22:58:26 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.5113
Posted: Mon Jan 23 22:58:26 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jan-84 09:37:57 EST
Lines: 20

#R:ihuxj:-35300:uokvax:5000061:000:836
uokvax!andree    Jan 22 04:39:00 1984

You are, of course, right in what Reagan thought he was saying. I knew
that, and thought things were obvious enough that I left off the :-).
[I'm not even sure that it's appropriate, in any case.]

On further thought, Reagan may even be right in what he was saying.
True, large areas have been deforested. But areas have been FORESTED
(reforested?) in that time. If I travel south out of OKC on I35, I am
travelling through some truly beautiful land, especially in the fall
when the trees - wait a minute! TREES! In the middle of GREAT PLAINS?!?
Something has definitely changed.

I don't think reagans comment is correct. I wouldn't bet against it,
though. It would take more research than I'm willing to do, especially
considering that many things going into it are debatable, themselves.

	"With wobbly to fill in the chinks"
	<mike