Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!harpo!eagle!allegra!alice!rabbit!jj
From: jj@rabbit.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: More Joy of Starvation (contains obscenity)
Message-ID: <2430@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 25-Jan-84 13:22:02 EST
Article-I.D.: rabbit.2430
Posted: Wed Jan 25 13:22:02 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jan-84 10:21:08 EST
References: <858@ihuxl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 58

OK.  Here goes. <Afterburners on full, fuel on full, oxidixer
on full>

GODDAMNIT Polli!  Renner didn't write the article you just flamed him
out for, I did.  At least rave at the right a*****e, will you?

Look, Mr. Polli, while it may all be simple to you, I happen to think
that it's reprehensible to bring more people into the world for
the express purpose of starving them.  You don't seem to care.
Ever heard of something called the "future"?  No?  Didn't think so,
you certainly don't want to plan for it.

While you are at it, where the HELL do you get off claiming that I
don't feel any responsiblity for world hunger?  I'm the one who
wants to look for a LASTING solution, not you.  You're the one
who doesn't want to either look at the consequences of his own actions
or be responsible for them.

If you want to work toward solving the problem of world hunger,
first learn something about it.  Then, after learning a little
about the problem, start to change the social, religious,
and economic systems that are causing hunger in the first place.
When you succeed in that, let me know.

When you have enough responsiblity to stop simplifying your
solutions to things that look good emotionally, but don't
have any basis in reality, come back and bother us.  If you
really WANT to help those people, why don't you start to push
for more EDUCATIONAL and SOCIAL aid to such countries, instead
of more food, without any other help?  That's what this country
can do. <And what it should, but is not, courtesy of people
who feel like you.>

(Oh yes.  I like your snide comments about simple philosphies.  Do you
enjoy breaking your own ten commandments?  <If this seems like a
non-sequeter (sp) to you, then you clearly don't.> Look at them someday,
will you?)

Give up, Polli.  You aren't reading the articles other people
are writing (after all, you would have seen the signature if
you DID read it), and you don't understand the little that you
see when you skim them for ammunition.  All you do is deliberately,
dishonestly, and maliciously take other people out of context so
that you can slander them and vent your own emotions.  Have you
ever seriously considered why you do that?  Really?  Why
don't you.  <Still judging, I see...>

And---Yes.  I know you are out to spread unhappiness.  You want to
make everyone as unhappy as you are.  (Did you claim to be
Christian yourself? Just wondered. )  As far as I'm concerned, you're not
a person to be seriously considered, and from now I'm not going
to consider you seriously.

I have work to do.
-- 
TEDDY BEARS ARE PEOPLE, TOO!

(allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj