Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!tektronix!azure!dadla-a!russ
From: russ@dadla-a.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Bible versions
Message-ID: <407@dadla-a.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Jan-84 10:33:41 EST
Article-I.D.: dadla-a.407
Posted: Wed Jan 11 10:33:41 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Jan-84 03:11:17 EST
References: ihuxq.475
Lines: 13



One of the main problems with the Revised Standard Version of the Bible is
that it made the erroneous assumption that the oldest manuscript was the most
correct. But the result of that assumption is the doubt that is placed on 
many of the passages in the New Testament.  Some of the later version have
still followed the lead of the Revised Standard Version but have relied on
more scholarship that has shown that assumption to be too simplistic.

I don't think that any Bible translations have replaced the King James Version. 

Russell Anderson
dadla-a!russ