Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!andree
From: andree@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: Even If I DID Believe ... (the d - (nf)
Message-ID: <5115@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Jan-84 22:59:05 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.5115
Posted: Mon Jan 23 22:59:05 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jan-84 09:38:37 EST
Lines: 22

#R:wu1:-23100:uokvax:8300036:000:890
uokvax!andree    Jan 22 05:31:00 1984

/***** uokvax:net.religion / uicsl!wombat /  2:10 pm  Jan 21, 1984 */
Physically fix women, eh? Why not fix men too? Make it a deliberate
act for both partners. The men wouldn't need to keep taking the
drug during pregnancy, so just make sure the one they need to fertilize
has nine-month side effects. This smacks of the sexist surgery issue
recently discussed in net.women.only.
						Wombat
						ihnp4!uiucdcs!uicsl!wombat
/* ---------- */

Fine by me. The point is to make having childern a deliberate, concsious
choice, as opposed to an undesired effect of another kind of choice. The
place I swiped the solution from put the fix in women, and I didn't see
any reason to change it. Seems to me that women are the logical place to
fix this particular bug, but I'm not a god (yet), so I can't say for sure.

I don't read net.women.only, not being a woman. What sex is a wombat?

	<mike