Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utcsstat.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsstat!laura From: laura@utcsstat.UUCP (Laura Creighton) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: getting over it... - (nf) Message-ID: <1651@utcsstat.UUCP> Date: Sat, 14-Jan-84 07:46:31 EST Article-I.D.: utcsstat.1651 Posted: Sat Jan 14 07:46:31 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Jan-84 08:15:03 EST References: <1379@pur-ee.UUCP> Organization: U. of Toronto, Canada Lines: 92 Here is Laura Creighton's cold and callous reaction to "broken hearts". The only thing that causes a broken heart is selfishness on the part of the person with the broken heart. This does not imply that this selfishness is what caused the relationship to end (though it could be) or that the other person was a saint, merely that if you have a "broken heart" then it is your problem. (This is distinct from merely hurting, which we all do, but real pain lasts about 20 minutes and then becomes self-pity or something even less desirable.) Okay, so if someone is "suffering from a broken heart" what they are actually believing (though possibly not understanding) is: "Oh I am so upset and miserable. I wanted the other to behave in such and such a way, and they didn't. Now how can I ever trust anybody again? Pity me." This, folks, is real loaded. First of all it implies that it is real good to enter into a relationship with a trunk full of wants that the other person is expected to fulfill. Indeed, many people thinkt hat this is what relationships are for. Also, it implies that you can only trust people who will give you what you want out of life. I do not believe that anyone has the right to make anybody else live their lives for their sake. This is a moral belief, which I cannot defend "rationally" -- it is based on my belief that we are all free and damn well should act like it, which is another moral belief. if you don't have these moral beliefs then my arguments above are likely to be meaningless. Mostly as you wander through life you meet people who believe "I am free, but you aren't -- you had better live up to my expectations or I will suffer a broken heart." This is a heavy load, and people shove it onto their significant others all the time. One you have landed the significant other you can keep them there through guilt-driven head games until they get so upset at their lack of freedom (even if they do not understand why it is that they have no freedom) that they pull the plug on the relationship. Then the traditional societal reaction is to call the person who ended the relationship a miserable slug and feel sorry for the poor broken-hearted soul that is left. This makes it damn hard to try to act like a free person, no? If you do so everybody will hate you... If you have a broken heart for more than 20 minutes then you are doing this because you want to. Of course, there may be a conflict of wants here, so that people can honestly both want and not want to have a broken heart at the same time. The world ain't black and white. if you are in this boat, then I suggest that you fix your need for a broken heart, not through time, but through discovering that other people are free as well and respecting them for it rather than resenting that they didn't live up to your expectations. this will fix your broken heart permanently, and have other wonderful effects. It will cause other people to think you are weird, however. If you don't want to do this, do you think that you could let people know that you expect them to live up to your expectations real early on (like the first date)? That way those of us who don't play by these rules can get suckered into another one of these lousy relationships. Don't think that by not telling you will keep us -- 'cause we are gonna end it one day if you refuse to live with *us* but instead keep trying to live with *what you expect us to be*. Above all else, if you go out with someone who asks you about this then DON'T LIE. That other has either been reading the right books lately, or has actually been down this road before and wants to save you both from pain and time wasting. Give us a break, huh? Life is tough enough as it is. FINALLY -- I know that this isn't a popular view. I also know that like most generalisations, there will be people whom it will not apply to -- out there is somebody who can have a genuine pain-type broken heart for more than 20 minutes, for instance. I don't want to hear about these people -- one of the big things about having the nice personal commitment to freedom is that you have to take people as they *are*, not as you *expect them to be*, remember, so I will have to notice this if I ever know them to a point where this is significant. If you just want to send me a flame because you don't like: a) this view or b) me personally don't expect a reply. I used to send replies, but I am too tired for that right now. Laura Creighton utzoo!utcsstat!laura