Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!sri-unix!Hans.Moravec@CMU-RI-ROVER From: Hans.Moravec%CMU-RI-ROVER@sri-unix.UUCP Newsgroups: net.space Subject: ASAT Message-ID: <15826@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Sun, 22-Jan-84 08:15:43 EST Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.15826 Posted: Sun Jan 22 08:15:43 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jan-84 05:39:13 EST Lines: 39 n066 1524 21 Jan 84 AM-WEAPONS Air Force Flight Tests ASAT Missile By JEFF GERTH c.1984 N.Y. Times News Service WASHINGTON - The Air Force announced on Saturday that it had conducted the first test in flight of an advanced missile designed to destroy satellites. The missile was fired from an F-15 fighter plane at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. The test involved only the booster and booster guidance system and did not involve any target, the Air Force said. Cmdr. Jeffrey S. Rink, a Pentagon spokesman, said details of the test and test results were classified and would not be disclosed. The anti-satellite missile was launched from an F-15 flying out of Edwards Air Force Base in California, the Air Force said. The test took place over the western test range of the Air Force's Western Space and Missile Center at Vandenberg Air Force Base. While the Air Force has conducted what it calls ''captive-carry'' tests over the past year, that is, taking the missile aloft attached to the F-15, the test on Saturday involved the first actual firing of the missile. The test of the missile, the U.S. Air-Launched Miniature Vehicle Anti-Satellite (ASAT), seems likely to increase the debate over weapons in space. In the past, such advocates as Dr. Herman Kahn, who headed the Hudson Institute before his death last year, argued that ''clean wars'' could be fought in space. Supporters have also said the Soviet Union has been testing an anti-satellite technology for some time. Almost immediately after the test a group of scientists denounced it as a dangerous escalation of the arms race. The scientists issuing the statement, who have been critical of the technology in the past, included Henry W. Kendall, chairman of the Union of Concerned Scientists; Jerome H. Bethe, a Nobel laureate in physics; and Dr. Richard Garwin, a physicist at the International Business Machines Corp. nyt-01-21-84 1815est ***************