Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihldt.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!ihldt!jhh
From: jhh@ihldt.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: NULL vs 0
Message-ID: <2209@ihldt.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Jan-84 09:41:40 EST
Article-I.D.: ihldt.2209
Posted: Fri Jan 20 09:41:40 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Jan-84 07:03:13 EST
References: <345@hocda.UUCP> <2406@rabbit.UUCP> <4808@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 5

What would break if stdio.h defined NULL as 0L for those systems
for which sizeof (int) == 2 and sizeof (anything *) == 4?  It seems
that this is the right level to keep such machine dependent
information.
			John Haller