Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC830919); site haring.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!cmcl2!philabs!mcvax!haring!jaap
From: jaap@haring.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Proposal for net.religion.jewish
Message-ID: <196@haring.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 10-Feb-84 01:38:03 EST
Article-I.D.: haring.196
Posted: Fri Feb 10 01:38:03 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Feb-84 07:37:15 EST
References: <6718@unc.UUCP>
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 23
Apparently-To: rnews@mcvax.LOCAL

<If you know about this line, I don't need to tell you>

Let's stop these type of discussions.

I think the discussions about creating net.religion.jewish is a duplicate of
the "let's create net.celts" discussion. I don't remember what the outcome was,
but if a special group for jewish culture will be created, I will suggest, to
follow the same pattern.

If you only want to discuss jewish religion, net.religion.jewish is the
obvious name if the discussion in net.religion about jewish religion is getting
to be too much for readers of net.religion.
Of course this will then lead in the end from net.religion.catholic up to
net.religion.protestant.<more to be inserted>.reformed.art33.

I don't mind which group is going to be created, as long as the subscribers
to it think it's useful. I only want to warn about creating a group, which
purpose is quite unclear. If you think there is need for any group,
don't discuss about the group but the subject where you want to talk
about. If that's clear, the group will be created because of the demand, not
because it might be a nice subject.

	Jaap Akkerhuis