Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site qtlon.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!ukc!qtlon!dave
From: dave@qtlon.UUCP (Dave Lukes)
Newsgroups: net.followup,eunet.followup
Subject: Re: Private Opinions: an Inquiry
Message-ID: <212@qtlon.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 11-Mar-84 09:44:44 EST
Article-I.D.: qtlon.212
Posted: Sun Mar 11 09:44:44 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 13-Mar-84 19:35:05 EST
References: <209@haring.UUCP> <1014@cbosgd.UUCP> <5712@mcvax.UUCP>, <293@erix.UUCP>
Organization: Quantime Ltd., London, WC1
Lines: 8

I personally think that all opinions (however motivated) are worth
hearing, so if someone wants to say something, but can't give a reason,
why not just say: `I think such and such, but I'm not allowed to say why'?
    Of course, if even revealing the `such and such' will result in a
breach of confidence, there is a problem: but in most cases, I doubt it.

			Yours in freedom of speech
				Dave Lukes (<U.K.>!uck!qtlon!dave)