Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles - hp internal release 1.2; site hp-pcd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hp-pcd!harold
From: harold@hp-pcd.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Who has the right over our bodies?
Message-ID: <76700004@hp-pcd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 7-Mar-84 10:57:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.76700004
Posted: Wed Mar  7 10:57:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 25-Mar-84 11:52:53 EST
References: <581@ihuxn.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Portable Computer Division - Corvallis, OR
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:ihuxn:-58100:hp-pcd:76700004:000:541
Nf-From: hp-pcd!harold    Mar 21 07:57:00 1984

<this line intentionally non-informative>

Again, I repeat the question "What constitutes being human?".  This IS
a fundamental issue in the abortion debates.  Why?  Simple.  *IF* the
fetus is NOT human, then the woman can exercise her right over her own
body without censure by anyone.  However, *IF* the fetus *IS* human,
the woman's "right over her own body" *CAN AND SHOULD* be limited by
LAW to protect the human-fetus's right to "life, liberty, etc.".

Thus, again, I ask the question:

What is Human???

Harold
!hplabs!hp-pcd!harold