Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!psuvax!psuvm%v6m
From: psuvm%v6m@psuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: orry kenn is wrong.  a really satisfying answer was given <shoot the bureaucrat>
Message-ID: <768@psuvm.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Mar-84 20:38:28 EST
Article-I.D.: psuvm.768
Posted: Tue Mar 27 20:38:28 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Mar-84 07:23:27 EST
Lines: 17

ow that I agree with.  As a side note this is one good reason to keep and
arry arms as in bill of rights...but I digress.

ow would I categorize the respondent?? meeting obligations of parenthood.

s for the answer he gave:
 The pro-lifers would save BOTH!!!! (methods would be debated of course)
 The pro-choicers , I don't think would make this a pro-choice issue and
 would fall back on personal ethics.  After all the baby is ALIVE. the
hoice was made.
 usually get too infuriated over kenn the kenf when I read his postings
'll respond to the parts later, if Paul Dubuc doesn't beat me to it.



heers fellow comabatants.
        Marchionni     V6M@psuvm.bitnet