Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Artificial womb environments to carry extracted fetuses to term
Message-ID: <532@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Mar-84 17:45:50 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.532
Posted: Fri Mar 30 17:45:50 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Mar-84 08:29:25 EST
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 14

Funny, I was under the impression that everyone agreed that providing a
means for a fetus extracted from a woman's body to grow through the
intended pregnancy term in an external artificial womb environment (or
by transfer into the uterus of a willing "receptor" woman who would serve as
"mother") was a viable solution acceptable to all.  So, why are we arguing
instead of working to make that potential solution a reality?????

Are there people out there who don't see this as a viable solution??? (other
than those who would "force people to pay the price" for their choices, since
I think we're agreed that that reasoning is a veiled form of fascistic
religious thinking)
-- 
Those responsible for sacking those people who have just been sacked,
have been sacked.			Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr