Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!cbosgd!cbscc!pmd
From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul Dubuc)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Legal question of anti-abortionists
Message-ID: <2145@cbscc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 31-Mar-84 22:20:43 EST
Article-I.D.: cbscc.2145
Posted: Sat Mar 31 22:20:43 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Apr-84 08:26:33 EST
References: <813@ihuxq.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories <SCCS>, Columbus
Lines: 11


Aren't you clouding the issue, Ken?  Abortion has to do with whether or
not the fetus has a right to live.  We are talking about who may decide
to take whose life, not whether the fetus can sue someone or which country
they are a citizen of.

As far as child abuse goes, there are two distictions: 1) enforcability and
2) determination of harm caused directly by the parent's actions.  These are
much easier in the case of born children than unborn.

Paul Dubuc