Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxvv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxvv!brt
From: brt@pyuxvv.UUCP (B Reytblat)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: RE: The 9 month rape
Message-ID: <197@pyuxvv.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Apr-84 22:42:59 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxvv.197
Posted: Wed Apr  4 22:42:59 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Apr-84 01:31:53 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 15

<- go ahead, eat this line... MAKE MY DAY...

	9 month rape, huh?
	OK. Here goes:
Presuming the woman in question consented to the intercourse,
the cute little sperm were in her womb at her invitation .
Moreover, she knew full well that at least one of the little buggers would
insist on staying for a rather extended period (of say 9 months :-).
Granted, the child thus born doesn't bear much resemblance to
the orignally invited guest, the sperm. One can't, however, deny a
very close relationship between the two. Else why is the father responsible
for child support ?

			B.Reytblat
			...!pyuxvv!brt