Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!cca!ima!inmet!jc From: jc@inmet.UUCP Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Human rights for ova! - (nf) Message-ID: <1296@inmet.UUCP> Date: Sat, 21-Apr-84 00:09:41 EST Article-I.D.: inmet.1296 Posted: Sat Apr 21 00:09:41 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 22-Apr-84 08:32:53 EST Lines: 40 #N:inmet:22500001:000:1813 inmet!jc Apr 19 14:51:00 1984 [This line intentionally left nonblank] Hey, why are you people all restricting yourself to aborting fetuses? What about the poor unfertilized ovum? Isn't it human? Doesn't it have rights? First, it is obvious that an ovum is alive. Presumably there's no question here. If there is, you've got a real problem! Second, it is human. At least, if it came out of a human ovary, it is. You don't believe this? OK, then, what species is it? A frog, perhaps? Or maybe a begonia? No, it's clearly human. All 23 chromosomes plus surrounding cytoplasm, mitochondria, and assorted membranes are human. Since an ovum is a living, human creature, clearly it is our moral duty to protect its life. This obviously means fertilizing it; it'll die if we don't. Now, I'm not claiming that a woman who ovulates and fails (or even worse, refuses) to have it fertilized is guilty of murder. I believe the term is "negligent homicide" or "criminal negligence" or something like that. Similar to if you get out of your car with the engine running, it slips into gear, and it runs down a child. Not that you intentionally killed someone; you just took actions that incidentally led to a death which you could have prevented. Surely our moral guardians have thought this one over by now, but somehow I've missed their explanations. How about somebody enlightening me? At the same time, we should consider sperm, which are clearly also living, human creatures. Unfortunately, there's about a billion of them for each ovum. I don't see how any responsible creator could have set it up this way, so that 99.9999999% of all humans are doomed to death at the sperm stage of their development. Perhaps a theology student can explain this one to me? John M Chambers [inmet!jc]