Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 Fluke 1/4/84; site fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!witters
From: witters@fluke.UUCP (John Witters)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Live and Digital Recording
Message-ID: <562@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Apr-84 16:36:39 EST
Article-I.D.: vax1.562
Posted: Wed Apr  4 16:36:39 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Apr-84 05:38:55 EST
References: <176@whuxj.UUCP> <1597@tekig1.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Everett, WA
Lines: 7

Regarding CD's which were made from a master EQ'ed for vinyl.  Has anyone tried
comparing vinal against tapes from the same source?  How about tapes v.s. CD?
Does anyone make audiophile tapes anymore?  (I mean analog tapes, not digital
tapes).  It seems to me that tape suffers from a different set of shortcomings
than vinyl does.  It might be useful to do ABC tests between vinyl, tapes, and
CDs.