Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!elf
From: elf@utcsrgv.UUCP (Eugene Fiume)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Correction re: Nak, Dolby C, Cassettes
Message-ID: <3974@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Apr-84 10:24:02 EST
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.3974
Posted: Thu Apr 19 10:24:02 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Apr-84 11:17:42 EST
Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto
Lines: 16

With regard to my last message on the relative equivalence of several
tapes, I thought I'd submit a couple of corrections.

(1) The (acoustic) guitarist's name is MICHAEL Hedges, not David.
(2) I left out some X's and D's and stuff when reporting the tape
    formulations.  The tapes I used were: BASF Chromdioxid Maxima II,
    TDK SA, Maxell XLII-S, and Memorex MRX^3.  The advertising hype
    claims that Chromdioxid Maxima II and XLII-S are infinitely better
    than their respective older formulations Chromdioxid II and UDXLII.
    I tested an old UDXLII against the XLII-S (this time recording a
    track from a direct-to-disk album by the percussion group Nexus)
    and couldn't detect a difference.


Eugene Fiume
U of Toronto