Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uiuccsb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiuccsb!emrath
From: emrath@uiuccsb.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Don't Listen to Bad Anti-Skate Advic - (nf)
Message-ID: <5700037@uiuccsb.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 28-Apr-84 11:01:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiuccsb.5700037
Posted: Sat Apr 28 11:01:00 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Apr-84 00:47:00 EDT
References: <628@ihuxb.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:ihuxb:-62800:uiuccsb:5700037:000:722
Nf-From: uiuccsb!emrath    Apr 28 16:01:00 1984

#R:ihuxb:-62800:uiuccsb:5700037:000:722
uiuccsb!emrath    Apr 28 16:01:00 1984

/**** uiuccsb:net.audio / ihuxb!jphalter /  5:15 am  Apr 27, 1984 ****/

>> In theory, there should be no skating force present when an ungrooved
>> portion of an LP is played.

I'd sure like to see a reference to this theory of yours.
The theory I'm familiar with doesn't agree at all.
(I'm assuming the above statement applies to an articulated arm)

>>  Skating force originates because of the
>> oblique angle of an articulated tone arm (and therefore stylus) with
>> respect to the cutting angle of the groove.

I believe it should be "... with respect to the tangential (the velocity,
hence force, vector) at the point of contact between arm and disk."

	Perry Emrath, UofIL
	...{decvax|inuxc}!pur-ee!uiucdcs!emrath