Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ccvaxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!rmiller
From: rmiller@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Re: Sources of Leaded gas - (nf)
Message-ID: <4900038@ccvaxa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Apr-84 11:00:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.4900038
Posted: Mon Apr  9 11:00:00 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Apr-84 07:23:38 EST
References: <584@ariel.UUCP>
Lines: 12
Nf-ID: #R:ariel:-58400:ccvaxa:4900038:000:536
Nf-From: ccvaxa!rmiller    Apr  9 10:00:00 1984

#R:ariel:-58400:ccvaxa:4900038:000:536
ccvaxa!rmiller    Apr  9 10:00:00 1984

on avgas: there's a reason why it is more expensive (besides the fact
that it has to be certificated by the FAA). avgas contains A LOT more
detergent and other such stuff for reliability reasons. if i remember
correctly, it also contains a lot more lead then automobile gasoline.
even the 100LL (that's low lead) has more. this all may be good, and
the stuff will certainly work in a car, but you need to know about it
before putting it in your tank, especially if the engine you are running
has been "improved".
uiucdcs!ccvaxa!rmiller