Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site houxz.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!houxz!disc
From: disc@houxz.UUCP (S.BERRY)
Newsgroups: net.comics
Subject: DC Depth
Message-ID: <744@houxz.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Apr-84 09:24:46 EST
Article-I.D.: houxz.744
Posted: Wed Apr 18 09:24:46 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Apr-84 03:22:05 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 30



	...And if you are not going to objectively review it, then I 
	advise that you not review it at all. 

	...You want boring comics, books that aren't worth their price, 
	then try reading DC's stuff. Everytime I see a DC comic, I want 
	to regurgitate! Who gives a damn about DC characters? I certainly 
	don't! They have all the depth of a low-tide in the Dead Sea.

I'm pleased to see that you're so OBJECTIVE about DC.  That last
sentence or two is at least as scathing as some of the comments 
concerning your own beloved Secret Wars (probably more so).  For the 
record, I don't think SW is all that bad (I'm beginning to think 
there's something on that planet which is causing everyone to act so 
contrary to their "normal" natures--that or Shooter doesn't read his 
own comics.)  I do enjoy seeing so many characters interacting in 
one comic, though I'm distressed at the persecution (self-inflicted?) 
the X-Men are experiencing.

Back to your original comment about DC: pick up a copy of Teen Titans any
time in the last 3 years? Legion of Super-Heroes? Camelot 3000? Batman?
(How can you objectively say Batman has no depth?  He may not always be
a favorite or a big seller, but I've never heard anyone accuse him of
having no depth.)

...Well, to each their own...

				SJBerry