Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site stat-l Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Stat-L:acu From: acu@stat-l (Shoe) Newsgroups: net.consumers Subject: Re: Cash-payers: take note Message-ID: <32@stat-l> Date: Sat, 14-Apr-84 16:32:47 EST Article-I.D.: stat-l.32 Posted: Sat Apr 14 16:32:47 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 17-Apr-84 06:46:30 EST References: <607@pyuxqq.UUCP> <248@stcvax.UUCP> Organization: Purdue University Computing Center Lines: 36 I mailed the postcards American Express supplied to complain to one's congressman and senators about credit surcharges. In reply, I got a letter from my congressman (John Myers, 7th district, Indiana), the meat of which is reproduced below: "...This has been a highly controversial issue with the Senate and House taking opposite positions. The Senate, which wants to allow surcharges, passed a bill on February 28 to permanently lift the surcharge ban and allow surcharges of up to 5 percent on credit card purchases. Senator Alfonse D'Amato (R N.Y.) offered an amendment to the bill to impose a permanent ban on surcharges, but it was defeated by a vote of 22 to 66. The House Banking Committee, which wants a permanent surcharge ban, refused to consider the Senate bill. Similarly, the Senate vowed to block any bill providing for a permanent ban on surcharges passed by the House. To break this impasse, the House passed a compromise bill on April 3 to temporarily extend the ban on surcharges for 14 months, until May 13, 1985. I voted for the bill. The bill, H.R. 5026, also provides for a study by the Federal Trade Commission and the General Accounting Office to determine the impact of credit card use on consumer prices. The study should show whether there is any merit to the argument made by those who want to allow surcharges that cash customers are subsidizing credit card customers because merchants must increase their prices to cover credit card costs. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Jake Garn (R Utah) has advised that this compromise bill will be acceptable to the Senate, and the Senate is expected to pass the bill this week...." The letter was dated April 11, 1984. -- /dev/shoe UUCP: ...!pur-ee!pucc-j:acu ARPA: mas@purdue