Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pur-ee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!ecn-ee!kechkayl
From: kechkayl@ecn-ee.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: I think I know I can know, you know? - (nf)
Message-ID: <1752@pur-ee.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 29-Mar-84 04:15:21 EST
Article-I.D.: pur-ee.1752
Posted: Thu Mar 29 04:15:21 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Mar-84 02:07:41 EST
Sender: notes@pur-ee.UUCP
Organization: Electrical Engineering Department , Purdue University
Lines: 17

#R:decwrl:-656200:ecn-ee:15500007:000:570
ecn-ee!kechkayl    Mar 29 00:53:00 1984


		>The Agnostic says he doesn't think we can know.

	Sorry, but this is the first of your errors. As far as I was aware
an Agnostic is one who says "I don't know", as opposed to "I can't know".
As an agnostic myself, I don't see any real evidence to prove that god exists,
and I don't see any that proves his non-existence. (I do no consider no evidence
to be evidence against!!). I don't know. If yo can say that you do, I would
like to hear any LOGICAL PROOF that you might have. (NOT just faith).

					Thomas Ruschak
					pur-ee!kechkayl
					"Aiee! A toy robot!"