Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxa!wetcw
From: wetcw@pyuxa.UUCP (T C Wheeler)
Newsgroups: net.flame,net.politics
Subject: Re: Reagan and the economy, again.
Message-ID: <683@pyuxa.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Apr-84 08:26:58 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxa.683
Posted: Fri Apr  6 08:26:58 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Apr-84 04:42:12 EST
References: <2654@rabbit.UUCP> <1398@sunybcs.UUCP>, <411@dual.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 10

[]
Your economics prof needs to start reading the paper more often.
The announcement that the Armed Forces were to be added to the
employment roles was made months before it happened.  The drop
was .6% not 1%.  It only makes sense to me to include the military
in the number of employed, the rest of the Federal Employees are
included, and, after all, they are working(?) aren't they?  You
prof must have an axe to grind.
T. C. Wheeler