Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sjuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sb1!sb6!bpa!burdvax!sjuvax!armstron
From: armstron@sjuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: A new topic: semi-mandatory birth control
Message-ID: <242@sjuvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Apr-84 11:43:52 EST
Article-I.D.: sjuvax.242
Posted: Wed Apr  4 11:43:52 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Apr-84 05:30:30 EST
References: <140@cosivax.UUCP>
Organization: Saint Josephs Univ. Phila., Pa.
Lines: 16


		Sorry, but I just don't think any forced birth control (mandatory
or "semi"-mandatory) is acceptable.  Let's not forget the mind-control 
moral that we were all supposed to learn in "A Clockwork Orange".  

		Now, don't get me wrong... I realize that birth control and mind
control are two totally different topics (or are they... when you get down 
to it, the important thing is the CONTROL, not the "birth" or the "mind")
but I can simply see no justification for any reason.  

		In this case an ounce of prevention is definitely NOT worth a 
pound of cure!

					Len Armstrong
					St. Joseph's University
				{allegra | bpa | astrovax | burdvax}!sjuvax!armstron