Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watmath.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!saquigley From: saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.politics Subject: Re: Semi-Mandatory Birth Control - A New Point Message-ID: <7543@watmath.UUCP> Date: Sun, 15-Apr-84 14:32:34 EST Article-I.D.: watmath.7543 Posted: Sun Apr 15 14:32:34 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 15-Apr-84 23:38:46 EST References: <380@hogpc.UUCP> Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 51 David Pugh: Given a safe, effective, and long duration (1 year?) birth control drug, why not make its use semi-mandatory for children attending public high school? I say 'semi-mandatory' because I think it is reasonable for a person to be excused for religious beliefs, or other valid reasons. The idea, of course, is to make the use of effective birth control the norm (rather than the exception, as it seems to be now). Great, just great. I love these proposals which have no foundation whatsoever in reality. Exactly which "safe, effective, and long- duration" birth control method do you have in mind? The only one I know of which qualifies as such is abstinence and we all know what the enforcement of this one has done on teenagers... Seriously, why must we always resort to such sweeping generalised band-aid methods. Don't you think that teenagers have any brains to decide for themselves whether to have sex or not and whether to have birth-control or not? The advantages of birth control vs no birth control are obvious and I don't think that any teenager in his/her right mind would say that it is wiser not to use any form of birth control. It still remains true that many don't. Given this the most sensible things we could do is to first find out why some do not use birth-control and try to change those reasons. My guesses is that the reasons are very simple: 1- cost. Solution: make birth-control free (cheeper than massive enforcement of birth control being proposed above) 2- fear of being discovered by parents. Solution: remove "squeal" laws and emphasise confidentiality in birth-control matters. 3- ignorance. Solution: educate all teeenagers on the matters of reproduction and birth control. 4- attitudes: non-assertiveness from the part of the women, carelessness from the part of the men (usually). This is probably the hardest since there are many people (not just teenagers) who know about birth control and can afford it and are not afraid of being discovered by their parents, but who are still shy about these matters. The solution of course is for adults to help them develop a sense of responsability both towards others and towards themselves. This of course is a life-long process and implies that adults and society as a whole must provide a role-model of responsability for these people. I am afraid that this is probably too big a sacrifice to make and this is why it is much easier to blame the kids for not being responsible and force some birth-control on them since they are nit-wits rather than reassess our own attitudes on the matter. Sophie Quigley ...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax,allegra}!watmath!saquigley