Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!ihuxx!ignatz From: ignatz@ihuxx.UUCP (Dave Ihnat, Chicago, IL) Newsgroups: net.followup,net.micro Subject: Re: Software Piracy Message-ID: <704@ihuxx.UUCP> Date: Wed, 28-Mar-84 13:33:46 EST Article-I.D.: ihuxx.704 Posted: Wed Mar 28 13:33:46 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 30-Mar-84 00:15:08 EST References: <504@mprvaxa.UUCP> <804@ihuxq.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 51 This is a very sore point with me. I *will not* steal software--and Ghod knows of the temptations in this business, with wildly over-inflated prices and poor customer relations. But some people are starting to operate quite intelligently; here are some real-life, current examples: MicroSolutions, of DeKalb, IL markets a program called Uniform. It's a CP/M program to provide diskette formatting and interchange capabilities for a wide range of computers. Originally marketed at $49.95, the price was perfect; but it 'featured' an elaborate copy protection scheme that rendered the master copy good ONLY for making two (count 'em--2) copies of the program. These diskettes could not be copied, and the master couldn't be executed. If those disks ever went bad, you had to send in the master to be re-genned, for a $10.00 fee. This led to two things--first, my losing a night of sleep to figure out their scheme (I did), and secondly, scads of complaints to MicroSolutions. In an amazing burst of reason, they re-issued an improved version of the program, without the obnoxious copy protection. (Unfortunately, shortly after the re-release the price climbed to $69.95, but it's still just within the reach of a reasonable price.) J. G. Communications, of Tucson, AZ markets a hardware real-time clock for the Osborne 1; along with the hardware is a decent set of utility programs. They will sell the source to these programs--on a floppy, with documentation--for $12.00; the object comes free with the clock. Rationale? As the author told me, "They can have the source. I'll have something better out before they can." Makes bug fixes and reports much easier. I'm afraid I'll have to withhold the name of the company, and the product, for this last one; I haven't asked the person involved if they want full details popularly known on this deal. But suffice to say that the author of a quite popular 'C' compiler, who is a friend of mine, discovered that I am doing some work on a Zenith Z-100, but the people who bought the machine aren't going to shell out the $300-$400 such a compiler costs. He *gave* me a current copy of his system, with only the constraint that I not further distribute it. Purpose? He wants me to work with it, get to know it, and recommend it. (I just don't know if he wants people to know about the freebie.) If this product ran on my z80-based machine, you'd better damn well believe *I'd* shell out the cash, after working with it; and at least one client has ordered the system, because of my recommendation. Purpose of this (much longer than I intended) article? To show that all is not darkness on the software market, and, frankly, to spread the name of those companies that are making some effort to work with consumers, instead of against them. Dave Ihnat ihuxx!ignatz