Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!mark
From: mark@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lan
Subject: Re: Re: Ethernet cable length query
Message-ID: <6268@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 29-Mar-84 18:46:49 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.6268
Posted: Thu Mar 29 18:46:49 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Mar-84 07:05:13 EST
References: <2855@fortune.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 9

It seems to me that if the main reason to put both ends of the ethernet
cable in the machine room is to make TDR's easier, that is actually
a reason to have both ends accessible.  Accessibility is a considerably
weaker requirement than same roomness.  

This goes for the splitting and adding a repeater too.
-- 
Spoken: Mark Weiser 	ARPA:	mark@maryland
CSNet:	mark@umcp-cs 	UUCP:	{seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!mark