Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site vaxine.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!vaxine!ptw
From: ptw@vaxine.UUCP (P. T. Withington)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: More on pointers/arrays:  Function Arguments
Message-ID: <232@vaxine.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Apr-84 10:30:31 EST
Article-I.D.: vaxine.232
Posted: Fri Apr 13 10:30:31 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Apr-84 09:11:14 EST
References: <665@bbncca.ARPA>
Organization: Automatix Inc., Billerica, MA
Lines: 9

...*s and s[] equivalent as function arguments...

From a stylistic point of view I was always lead to believe the former
was preferable when you intended to s++.
Anyone care to expand on this concept as it applies to argv?

**argv                  Preferred when you intend to argv++
*argv[]                 Preferred when you will argv[i]
argv[][]                Hm.