Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1a 12/4/83; site rlgvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!guy
From: guy@rlgvax.UUCP (Guy Harris)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.mail
Subject: Re: suggestion for rmail
Message-ID: <1859@rlgvax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 15-Apr-84 01:31:55 EST
Article-I.D.: rlgvax.1859
Posted: Sun Apr 15 01:31:55 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Apr-84 23:35:51 EST
References: <606@pyuxqq.UUCP>, <114@down.UUCP> <4500@amd70.UUCP> <417@dual.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Office Systems Group, Reston, VA
Lines: 10

Actually, it sounds more like Mark Horton's "uuroute"/"uubang"; "sendmail"
doesn't give the proverbial X about routing.  It merely decides which mail
delivery program should be run to deliver the message; the delivery program
does the re-routing, if any.

	Guy Harris
	{seismo,ihnp4,allegra}!rlgvax!guy

P.S.  We have a version that runs happily on a USG UNIX system (with UNET,
used for the SMTP daemon mode)