Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!pallas@Pescadero.ARPA
From: pallas@Pescadero.ARPA (Joseph I. Pallas)
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re: "blaming Unix SendMail"
Message-ID: <492@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Apr-84 18:06:05 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.492
Posted: Fri Apr 20 18:06:05 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Apr-84 07:22:58 EST
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 12
To: MRC@SU-Score, smoot@UT-SALLY.ARPA
Cc: Header-People@MIT-MC.ARPA

Sorry, MRC, but relative addressing is still necessary even when it is
safe to use.  In your example,

		foo!bar!rag!zowie

it's still possible that foo doesn't know how to talk to ANY machine
named rag, let alone two of them.  That's why SMTP supports source
routing.  Of course, domains will change all that Real Soon Now.

joe