Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 larry 2/4/84; site hlexa.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!hlexa!phil
From: phil@hlexa.UUCP (Phil Fleming)
Newsgroups: net.math
Subject: Re: n! not a square.
Message-ID: <1684@hlexa.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 26-Mar-84 09:11:13 EST
Article-I.D.: hlexa.1684
Posted: Mon Mar 26 09:11:13 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 27-Mar-84 01:12:38 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Short Hills, NJ
Lines: 16



It seems to me that a COMPLETE solution to a problem should
include references for nonobvious theorems used in the solution.
Simply giving a name to a result or saying you forget names of
theorems is clearly insuffient.

I am, of course referring to the statement;

Theorem: For any prime p, there is another prime q such that p<q<2p .

Does anyone have a reference for the proof of this?


				Phil Fleming