Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!mason From: mason@utcsrgv.UUCP (Dave Mason) Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Micros for universities. (Libraries vs. Teaching) Message-ID: <3740@utcsrgv.UUCP> Date: Wed, 4-Apr-84 17:32:47 EST Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.3740 Posted: Wed Apr 4 17:32:47 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 4-Apr-84 20:16:53 EST References: <410@sri-arpa.UUCP> Organization: University of Toronto/Ryerson Polytechnic Institute Lines: 38 Ryerson Polytechnical Institute is trying to do exactly what ron@Brl-Tgr suggests: treating micros as a library resource. Every student in the institute has paid an extra $25 for the last 2 years to buy a microcomputer facility which is in the library. We have 60 IBM-PCs, 25 Apples, 25 CP/M machines (Zenith-89s and NEC-8000s) more or less connected to 2 20 meg winchesters over Omninet (less right now, more when I finish the network install) with our own network software. This having been paid for out of student funds other than tuition is not allowed to be used for teaching, but is a student resource. Students use it for word processing, computer literacy, learning to program, game playing. We had our doubts in the first year, but it seems to be well used now. I can answer technical questions, and can direct anyone who is interested in administration type questions to the proper person. This is one type of computer resource that I feel is needed. Here the need is UNQUESTIONABLY for existing software, and note that we have the machines that support 90+% of the available software. This is a very important kind of resource to have available for non-computer types (as well as the computer types). At Ryerson we have programs including Fashion, Photo Arts, Radio-Television, Theatre, Business, Engineering, as well as Business Computer and Applied Computer Science. Only about 10% of the students are in one of those last 2 programs. HOWEVER, that is not what is required in a Computer Science program. I have already expressed my opinions on the 8086 vs. 68000 vs. 16032 question, so suffice it to say that I think computer science students need computer systems available with sufficient power and elegance that they can attack and solve interesting, real, problems, and operating systems and development software that make that possible. It is difficult (though perhaps not impossible) to do that on processors with archaic architectures. -- Usenet: {dalcs dciem garfield musocs qucis sask titan trigraph ubc-vision utzoo watmath allegra cornell decvax decwrl ihnp4 uw-beaver} !utcsrgv!mason Dave Mason, U. Toronto CSRG CSNET: mason@Toronto ARPA: mason%Toronto@CSNet-Relay