Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site iuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!notes
From: notes@iuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.misc
Subject: Re: Re: Why is there SiO2 in Equal (Nutr - (nf)
Message-ID: <251@iuvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Mar-84 01:03:16 EST
Article-I.D.: iuvax.251
Posted: Tue Mar 27 01:03:16 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Mar-84 01:24:58 EST
Sender: notes@iuvax.UUCP
Organization: Indiana University
Lines: 12

#R:uw-june:-113900:iuvax:500006:000:370
iuvax!apratt    Mar 26 15:05:00 1984

Isn't SiO2 basically SAND?  I always thought (with no foundation in reality)
that the SiO2 was in there to make Equal granular, and that one of the other
ingredients was included to make the SiO2 dissolve in liquids. I thought it
was kind of funny that it required one ingredient to cancel the effects of the
other.
							-- Allan Pratt
						ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!apratt