Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.misc,net.bio,net.origins
Subject: Re: Scientific Creation != Biblical Creation
Message-ID: <559@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Apr-84 15:06:35 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.559
Posted: Wed Apr 11 15:06:35 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Apr-84 07:14:59 EST
References: <970@qubix.UUCP> <612@ihuxn.UUCP> <979@qubix.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 14

>>Specifying a creator in the singular form mutually excludes the participation 
>>of multiple creators in the creation enterprise. On the other hand, using the
>>plural form "Creators" would treat all creators equally and fairly, thus,
>>removing the discriminatory language from the proposed law.

> Multiple creators haven't gotten past Occam's Razor. Common design has
> indicated a common designing agent.  ---Larry Bickford

More likely if the universe was "designed" at all, it appears more likely that
it was designed by committee...
-- 
"An argument is an intellectual process.  It isn't the automatic gainsaying of
	what the other person says."
"... Can be."					Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr