Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.music,net.audio,net.misc
Subject: Re: Request for net.music.classical news group
Message-ID: <608@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 28-Apr-84 21:55:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.608
Posted: Sat Apr 28 21:55:36 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Apr-84 08:13:57 EDT
References: <639@ihuxn.UUCP>, <2445@allegra.UUCP> <901@ihuxq.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 15

> Yet another yes.  And yes, Rich Rosen, even if it only gets
> one posting every other month!  But then, most rock enthusiasts
> have so blown their ears out with N-chord harmonies at M db,
> where N < 4, M > 100 (conjecture: N+M=k), that they cannot be
> expected to appreciate the subtleties of silence.
> Of course, I consider music written after 1750 "modern", and the
> sound of a Baroque lute "loud".

Chalk up one more for those who claim that the reason for net.music.classical
has nothing to do with the snobbishness of its proponents.  I guess *they*
haven't yet seen ongoing classical music discussions in net.music because
they don't subscribe.
-- 
"I'm not dead yet!"
"Oh, don't be such a baby!"	Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr