Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!we13!ihnp4!fortune!rpw3
From: rpw3@fortune.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: proposed posting of news stats - (nf)
Message-ID: <3105@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Apr-84 04:15:11 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.3105
Posted: Thu Apr 19 04:15:11 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Apr-84 00:42:39 EST
Sender: notes@fortune.UUCP
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 22

#R:amd70:-454200:fortune:7400004:000:750
fortune!rpw3    Apr 18 20:43:00 1984

Do we still need ba.*? Well, maybe I should ask Mark Stein (but he's
busy), but does 'notes' understand posting responses to the correct
(i.e., original) distributions? If not, we could be opening up some
security problems, as we use notes HEAVILY here with fs.* groups to
talk about dirty laundry...

In fact, I don't see how to get 'notes' to set the distribution even
on an original article (base note).

(Aha! Easy quick test! If this response gets outside ba.*, then notes
is NOT copying the distributions properly. Any non-Bay-Area readers
please mail a short hello?)

Rob Warnock

UUCP:	{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd70,hpda,harpo,sri-unix,allegra}!fortune!rpw3
DDD:	(415)595-8444
USPS:	Fortune Systems Corp, 101 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065