Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utcsstat.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsstat!geoff
From: geoff@utcsstat.UUCP (Geoffrey Collyer)
Newsgroups: net.news.b
Subject: Re: bug fix to a posted bug fix
Message-ID: <1838@utcsstat.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 10-Apr-84 02:13:48 EST
Article-I.D.: utcsstat.1838
Posted: Tue Apr 10 02:13:48 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Apr-84 03:03:16 EST
References: <829@nsc.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Toronto, Canada
Lines: 19

Well, Chuq, I had a look for my original article containing my new
findngsize() and can't find it.  I'm pretty sure that I posted the
code by copying it out of my production source with an editor and
the following is the line in question taken directly from my production
rfuncs.c, which hasn't changed since I posted my article:

		if (sscanf(buf, "%s %ld", n, &s) == 2 && strcmp(n, ng) == 0) {

I have not seen the symptoms you describe and I didn't retype my changes,
I took them directly from the source.  Is it possible that you mistyped
my corrections?  I'm a pretty careful coder and the evidence at my end
is that I *did* test for equality of n and ng.

If you would mail me your copy of my original article, I'd appreciate it.
Perhaps we should pursue this privately.  I am a little concerned that
people will have the mistaken impression that I posted an untested and
incorrect fix.

Geoff Collyer, U. of Toronto